![]() ![]() My most recent project in REAPER has 28 tracks with 49 FX (47 of which are OverTone DSP plugins) and playing it at 64 samples latency shows me I'm only using 24.96% of my CPU's total capacity. ![]() Now that I'm running almost all native Linux plugins, I'm not taxing my CPU at all. While I don't really use virtual amps, I do always monitor through REAPER and frequently do it through 3 to 5 VST plugins.Ħ4 samples latency is how I run all the time, and only on the most complex of projects do I ever have to increase to 128 during the final mixing and mastering phases. Like you're playing through a slap echo or something. If you hit a note on a guitar but the sound for it doesn't come out until 30ms later it's going to feel real sloppy playing. If you monitor through REAPER like I do, then low latency is a big deal. by the time we're talking about 64 or less you could just move closer to the speakers and save the extra CPU usage. I think the issue is that I was running slightly larger buffer settings than most here seem to (I seldom need to drop the buffer size below 256 normally - I certainly wouldn't need to go to 64 in normal usage. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |